Initialize second brain vault

05_Resources/Home Lab Architecture.md

@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+# Home Lab Architecture
+
+## Current-state sketch
+
+```mermaid
+flowchart TD
+    U[Claudio devices\nMacBook Pro M4\niPad Air M3\niPhone 15 Pro]
+    RA[Remote access layer\nTailscale / ZeroTier / Pangolin / Cloudflare]
+    VPS[Netcup VPS\nweb apps + remote proxy]
+    NAS[Synology DS218+\nDrive / Photos / Jellyfin / Plex]
+    PNAS[Parents' Synology NAS\nfuture off-site backup target]
+    DELL[Old Dell laptop\nDebian\nHome Assistant + Restic backup server]
+    PMX[MacBook Pro 2017 Intel\nProxmox\nOpenClaw / Ollama / Grafana / Pangolin-Newt]
+    PI[Raspberry Pi 3\nspare / test]
+    FUT[Future storage ideas\nold disks / possible CEPH later]
+
+    U --> RA
+    RA --> VPS
+    RA --> NAS
+    RA --> DELL
+    RA --> PMX
+    RA --> PI
+    NAS -. future backup .-> PNAS
+    DELL -. backup orchestration .-> PNAS
+    FUT -. future .-> PMX
+    FUT -. future .-> NAS
+```
+
+## Desired operating model
+
+```mermaid
+flowchart LR
+    Users[Claudio / family / friends]
+    Access[Unified remote access + identity]
+    Prod[Production environment\nreliable, documented, backed up]
+    Test[Testing environment\nexperimentation / breakable]
+    Backup[Backups + restore validation]
+    Docs[Documentation\nObsidian second brain]
+
+    Users --> Access
+    Access --> Prod
+    Access --> Test
+    Prod --> Backup
+    Test --> Backup
+    Prod --> Docs
+    Test --> Docs
+```
+
+## Recommended interpretation
+The current setup already has enough moving parts that the main risk is architectural drift, not lack of hardware.
+The next step should be simplification and boundary-setting, not adding many more apps.
+A good target is to define one production lane, one testing lane, and one backup strategy before larger migrations.
+
+## Near-term planning questions
+- What exactly counts as production today?
+- Which host should be the primary app host?
+- Which remote-access path should become the default?
+- What is the restore story for each critical service?
+- Which current services should stay on Synology for now?

05_Resources/Home Lab Inventory.md

@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+# Home Lab Inventory
+
+## Personal devices
+- MacBook Pro M4 — main computer
+- iPad Air M3
+- iPhone 15 Pro
+
+## Server / infra equipment
+- Synology DS218+
+  - 2 × 18 TB
+  - RAID 1
+  - roughly 16 TB usable
+  - currently used for Synology Drive, Synology Photos, Jellyfin, Plex
+- Old Dell laptop
+  - Debian
+  - running Home Assistant
+  - backup server (Restic)
+- MacBook Pro 2017 Intel
+  - Proxmox
+  - 10 GbE
+  - currently running:
+    - OpenClaw
+    - Ollama
+    - Grafana
+    - Pangolin/Newt
+- Raspberry Pi 3
+  - currently not in active use
+  - available for testing
+- Old hard disks
+  - possible future CEPH experimentation
+  - not a current priority
+- Netcup VPS (Germany)
+  - runs a couple of web apps
+  - remote proxy
+- Parents' Synology NAS
+  - 2 × 4 TB
+  - used locally by Claudio's parents today
+  - possible future managed off-site backup target once Claudio's system is ready
+
+## Remote access / overlay / edge tools in use
+- Tailscale
+- ZeroTier
+- Pangolin
+- Cloudflare reverse proxy / Zero Trust tunnel
+
+## Intent
+The system should eventually support reliable services for family and friends, so operational simplicity and backups matter more than novelty.

05_Resources/Swiss Federal Vote 2026-03-08.md

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+# Swiss Federal Vote 2026-03-08
+
+## Results
+- SRG / media licence fee cut initiative: rejected, 62% No
+- Climate fund initiative: rejected, 71% No
+- Individual taxation for married couples: accepted, 54% Yes
+- Cash counterproposal: accepted, 73% Yes
+- Turnout: 56%
+
+## Summary
+The Federal Council's preferred line won on all four issues.
+Voters supported a targeted tax reform and strong constitutional protection for cash.
+They rejected both a large climate fund and cuts to public broadcasting funding.
+Overall result: pragmatic, relatively cautious, and not very appetite-driven for big new spending.