vault backup: 2024-12-02 22:38:07
This commit is contained in:
@@ -34,8 +34,7 @@ status: started
|
||||
> Apparently there is no scientific background to the claims of the book made by Thomas Erikson. It is based on the [[Personality Tests#DiSC|DiSC]] test, which has its origin in the 1930s and has scientifically not been show accurate. The results have high reliability (consistent results over time) but their validity is questionable.
|
||||
|
||||
Nonetheless, I think there are learnings in the books. The way the different personalities are described is accurate and I did remember several interactions with people while reading it. It is important not to judge people's character through the lens of the colours, but rather using it to strategise the best responses with respect to behaviour. If someone shows red behaviour, we take it as red behaviour and act accordingly - we don't say the person is red. Behaviours can be very environment dependent.
|
||||
A critical comment can be found here: https://www.vof.se/blogg/one-of-swedens-biggest-scientific-bluffs/
|
||||
|
||||
A critical comment can be found here: [One of Sweden's biggest scientific bluffs – Vetenskap och Folkbildning](https://www.vof.se/blogg/one-of-swedens-biggest-scientific-bluffs/).
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
## Clippings
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user